Staff View for: Second language skills for all? : analyz

 Staff view

You must be logged in to Tag Records

Second language skills for all? : analyzing a proposed language requirement for U.S. Air Force officers /

Chaitra M. Hardison [and others].

Book Cover
Names: Hardison, Chaitra M.
Published: Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 2012.
Series: Technical report (Rand Corporation) ; TR-1189-AF.
Topics: Second language acquisition. | Communicative competence - United States. | EDUCATION - Multicultural Education. | United States. Air Force - Officers - Training of.
Regions: United States.
Genres: Electronic books.
Tags: Add

Spaces will separate tags.
Use quotes for multi-word tags.

000 05018cam a2200565Ki 4500
001 580365
003 IWUdb
005 20171024100103.0
006 m o d
007 cr cnu---unuuu
008 140321s2012 caua ob 000 0 eng d
020 |a9780833083180|q(electronic bk.)
020 |a083308318X|q(electronic bk.)
020 |z9780833060341
020 |z0833060341
027 |aRAND/TR-1189-AF
035 |a(OCoLC)ocn874143751
037 |a22573/ctt4cxtp2|bJSTOR
040 |aJSTOR|beng|erda|epn|cJSTOR|dOCLCF|dYDXCP|dOCLCQ|dCOO|dIWUdb
043 |an-us---
049 |aICOA
050 4|aUG638|b.S43 2012eb
072 7|aEDU020000|2bisacsh
072 7|aBUS066000|2bisacsh
072 7|aBUS012000|2bisacsh
082 04|a358.4/161|223
245 00|aSecond language skills for all? :|banalyzing a proposed language requirement for U.S. Air Force officers /|cChaitra M. Hardison [and others].
264 1|aSanta Monica, CA :|bRAND,|c2012.
300 |a1 online resource (xxiii, 148 pages) :|bcolor illustrations.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |acomputer|bc|2rdamedia
338 |aonline resource|bcr|2rdacarrier
490 1 |aReport ;|vTR-1189-AF.
504 |aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 141-148).
505 0 |aIncreasing the language proficiency of incoming Air Force officers -- RAND's study -- Organization of the report -- Background on adult language learning -- Measuring language proficiency -- Categories of difficulty -- The supply of language expertise -- Individual differences among language learners -- Educational programs designed to achieve high levels of proficiency -- After language learning: attrition and maintenance -- Implications -- Survey of Air Force officers -- Survey sample -- Survey content -- Survey results -- Language skills among Air Force officers -- Language learning experiences -- Relationships between language skills and other desirable outcomes -- Mandatory proficiency policies -- Incentives and disincentives for learning a second language -- Open-ended responses -- Conclusions and recommendations -- Conclusions -- Recommendations -- Immediate next steps -- Closing comment -- A. Descriptions of the ILR proficiency levels -- B. List of language flagship programs -- Screenshots of the survey -- Language courses at ROTC detachments -- E. Additional details on "other" and open-ended responses.
520 |aWould it be feasible to require all Air Force officers to attain a specific level of proficiency in a second language at commissioning? Would there be unintended consequences? To find out, the authors asked Air Force officers about their own language-learning experiences, what they thought about language learning and mandatory language proficiency policies, what incentives and disincentives they perceived, among other questions. While the officers felt language proficiency was important for mission success, they were not convinced about its importance for career success. They also noted that the time and commitment required to attain proficiency might interfere with other, more pressing academic demands. The languages most have studied already are not among those most critical to national security, and those who were required to study a language considered themselves less proficient than those who had studied it voluntarily. Language skills were, however, associated with other desirable outcomes, such as greater interest in and tolerance of other cultures and being interested in and capable of learning another language in the future. But requiring all to attain such proficiency before commissioning would mean fewer would be eligible for it. Instead, we suggest implementing a variety of pre- and post-commissioning language-learning incentives and opportunities designed to accommodate learners at all levels (from those just starting out to those who are at more advanced levels) and to increase acquisition of underrepresented and strategic languages. Career-long policies for maintaining and increasing language proficiency would be needed to make pre-commissioning and early career efforts worthwhile.
588 0 |aPrint version record.
610 10|aUnited States.|bAir Force|xOfficers|xTraining of.
610 17|aUnited States.|bAir Force.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst00538280
650 0|aSecond language acquisition.
650 0|aCommunicative competence|zUnited States.
650 7|aEDUCATION|xMulticultural Education.|2bisacsh
650 7|aArmed Forces|xOfficers|xTraining of.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst01351837
650 7|aCommunicative competence.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst00870361
650 7|aSecond language acquisition.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst01110576
651 7|aUnited States.|2fast|0(OCoLC)fst01204155
655 4|aElectronic books.
700 1 |aHardison, Chaitra M.
776 08|iPrint version:|tSecond language skills for all?|z9780833060341|w(DLC) 2012041174|w(OCoLC)812531832
830 0|aTechnical report (Rand Corporation) ;|vTR-1189-AF.

Staff View for: Second language skills for all? : analyz